He just cannot say to someone who enjoys quail or pork chops that it is “wrong” to eat them.
#Am i gay for god free
Peter is thus free to eat, or not eat, whatever he wants. He is to distinguish what is essential from what is not. Peter had just insisted that he would not violate the Law. (I often cite this passage to my vegetarian friends). He sees that all animals, tame and wild, are clean. Peter has a vision, guided by the Holy Spirit, no less. The immediate issue was eating meat of animals designated as “unclean” by the Old Law. The similar passage in Acts concerned the salvation of Gentiles. Many people today simply “assume” that, with Pope Francis, the Church has now accepted “modernity.” Implicitly, she admits that her famous prohibitions were wrong. The New Testament begins with “repent and believe.” What cannot be “forgiven” are “ideas” that make evil good in such a way that we now advocate what is evil as “our good.” When Pope Francis cited the “Who am I to judge?” passage, he was widely understood to have, in effect, blessed relativism. “Sin,” as such, is evil, but that is not the last word. We can trace what happens when we make what is evil to be good in the lives of human beings and societies. To violate any one of them will undermine some aspect of our being and good. “Who am I to judge?” means, basically, that God makes the laws of being. He did not mean that God suddenly changed His mind on divorce, fornication, adultery, abortion, homosexuality, gay marriages, euthanasia or other widely practiced issues. He was restating the classical doctrine that God was the final judge of each individual soul. In this misreading, the Church has “changed.” Not even the pope, by his own admission, can say anything effective about those who engage in such practices.Ī whole industry has arisen to show that this pope did not “mean” to change any basic teachings. Thus, analogously, practitioners of divorce, contraception, homosexuality, drugs, adultery, abortion, fetal experimentation, and euthanasia are no longer “judged” to be “wrong.” Pope Francis words – “Who am I go judge?” – are usually understood to mean that what is called by the Scripture or the Church a “sin” need not be considered as such. It is not about making what is a sin not a sin. Forgiveness of sins is what Christianity is about.
#Am i gay for god license
Forgiveness, however, is not license to return to old ways, even though it is difficult to change habits. If the same gay man were actually confessing in the Sacrament, the priest would have to “judge” either to give absolution or not, depending on his assessment of the man’s resolve to “sin no more.” If the man did sin and was repentant, his sins are forgiven. The pope referred to a gay person who “is searching for the Lord and has good will.” In that context, one could say: “Who am I to judge?” But what of one who does not “search” or have “good will?” Pope Francis’s question occurred in and interview as he was returning from World Youth Day in Rio. Two scriptural passages are close to the same phrase: “Who was I (Peter) that could withstand God?” (Acts 11:17) “Who are you to pass judgment on another’s servant?” (Romans 14:4)
![am i gay for god am i gay for god](https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/easton-4.jpg)
Almost always, the citation implies some approval of homosexual life-style. On the Internet, Pope Francis’ question “Who am I to judge?” – is cited hundreds of times.